LinkedIn thought leader ad examples

Is a 50% application submission rate a good result? For a full-time MBA, it's well above average. For an Executive Master's, it's well below. Without a benchmark, how would you know? After more than 17 years working with higher education institutions, I've seen how difficult it can be to answer a seemingly simple question: How well are we actually converting prospective students? That's why I'm particularly proud to share Full Fabric 2025–2026 Admissions Conversion Benchmark Study, built with data from 19 Financial times ranked business schools across 9 European countries and more than 100 programmes. A few findings that stood out to me: → There's no such thing as a typical admissions funnel. Certificates and diplomas convert 67% of prospects into applicants, compared with just 11% for online MBAs. → Some programmes need a much wider funnel than others. For every student enrolled, full-time MBAs need around 94 prospects and 14 started applications. Part-time and Executive MBAs need fewer than 4 started applications per enrolled student. → Application fees involve a trade-off. Programmes charging an application fee see around 10 percentage points fewer completed applications, but 13 percentage points more admitted candidates enrolling, compared with their programme-type averages. → Not all applications have the same financial value. Executive MBAs generate approximately €21,900 in cohort tuition value per started application, compared with €3,400 for full-time MBAs. A huge thank you to the 19 institutions that contributed their data and made this research possible. How does your institution compare? 📊 Download the full Admissions Conversion Benchmark Study to benchmark your programmes, identify where prospective students drop out, and uncover opportunities to improve conversion. https://lnkd.in/e3an6kjT #HigherEducation #Admissions #EnrolmentManagement #BusinessSchools

"INVESTÉR I DINE MEDARBEJDERES UDVIKLING Kompetenceudvikling handler ikke kun om faglig viden. Det handler også om at give medarbejdere de bedste forudsætninger for at lykkes i en digital hverdag. Med et kursus hos os bliver dine medarbejdere mere selvstændige og bedre rustet til de krav, der møder dem i arbejdslivet. Det styrker både den enkelte medarbejder og arbejdspladsen som helhed. Og så er det helt gratis! 📈 Øget trivsel 💼 Stærkere kompetencer 🤝 Bedre muligheder for fastholdelse 📞 Kontakt os for en uforpligtende dialog om ordblindeundervisning i jeres virksomhed: 70 20 23 77."

94% completion. Zero behavior change. That's not a training win. That's a blind spot. A client showed me their L&D dashboard last month. 94% completion rate, 4.6 out of 5 satisfaction. By every metric on that slide, the training had worked. Three months later, the actual behavior on the floor hadn't moved at all. To be honest, this isn't rare, it's the norm. Decades of research keep landing on the same number: only 10-20% of what's taught in formal training actually transfers into on-the-job behavior. Manager-required compliance training routinely hits 90%+ completion and still produces no real change, because completion measures whether someone clicked through a module, not whether they do anything differently under pressure. Leadership knows this, sort of, and still optimizes for the wrong signal. A 2026 Gartner survey of security leaders found 84% of organizations prioritize training completion as their top metric, while only 6% track the thing that actually predicts risk: how often people bypass the training the moment it's inconvenient. We keep grading the easy test and then act surprised when the real-world score doesn't match. The thing is, completion rate was never a business outcome. It's a proxy that's easy to drop into a slide. Behavior change, time-to-competency, fewer repeat errors, fewer workarounds under deadline pressure - that's the real test, and it's harder to measure, so most companies quietly stop looking. If your training dashboard leads with completion, you're not measuring whether the training worked. You're measuring whether the LMS can export a report. What do you think - does your org measure behavior or just attendance? #LearningAndDevelopment #FrontlineWorkforce #TrainingROI

The Swedish school debate has been focused on who runs schools for too long. But the data reveals a different reality: the priority must be a consistent focus on educational quality. A new 10-year review (2016–2025) by Valfrihetskommissionen reveals a clear national pattern. Out of the 87 schools that have remained in the top quartile for an entire decade, 65 are independent schools. I am incredibly proud that seven Internationella Engelska Skolan (IES) schools — Täby, Nacka, Bromma, Järfälla, Lund, Sundsvall and Uppsala — are in this elite tier. Why does this matter? At these schools, an average of over 90% of students graduate with passing grades in every subject. This isn't a "good year" — it is a decade of: ▪️ High Expectations: Challenging every student to reach their potential. ▪️Tough Love: A safe, orderly environment where teachers can teach. ▪️Knowledge First: A relentless focus on academic outcomes over political trends. The real question for Sweden isn’t about school ownership — it’s about quality. Can Sweden take the "best practices" from these top-performing schools and apply them to schools that have underperformed for too long? At IES, we believe every child deserves a school that works. Not just this year, but every year. #Education #Leadership #IES #SchoolResults #FutureOfSweden #QualityEducation

Hur byter man topplockspackning på en Volvo 765 TIC -86, USA-import? Den frågan ställde jag till all personal idag på veckans personalmöte, som de sedan fick diskutera i par. Alla såg förvirrade och osäkra ut, men trevande tog de sig an frågeställningen. Sedan gick jag igenom specifikationerna för bilen och visade även en jämförelse mellan denna modell och en traditionell svensksåld 745a. Sa att det blir prov på detta på fredag, endast E-nivå. Syftet med övningen var att exponeras för den situation många av våra elever mer eller mindre flera gånger dagligen hamnar i - att tvingas lära sig något som de är i grunden helt ointresserade av. Jag skulle kunna prata i timmar om bilen på bilden men det var tydligt att personalen inte delade min entusiasm kring vrålåket. Så vad påverkar en elevs möjligheter att ta till sig möjligheten att lära sig om något de inte kan något om och egentligen inte är så intresserade av? Att prestera sitt yttersta i ett område de tror sig aldrig behöva igen? Vi måste ha rätt förväntningar, förbereda på rätt sätt så ett intresse + förkunskap finns - och utifrån det bygga begreppsförståelse och lägga upp en plan med inlärningsstrategier och aktiviteter som går hand i hand med inlärningsprocessen. Dagligen sätts våra elever i situationer där de ska byta topplockspackningar, det är vårt jobb att göra detta både relevant och kul. Så de kan äga sin egen kunskapsutveckling. Våra elever ska vara insatta i sin utbildning, inte utsatta för den. P.S! För de intresserade: Inte säkert att personalen blev så imponerad över min liknelse idag, men jag fick åtminstone chansen att prata lite turbo, spoiler och USA-lyktor. Ett sant lyckorus. Bilen på bilden är för övrigt min första bilkärlek. En Volvo 765 TIC -86, USA-importerad med chippad 940-motor från -94. Fullutrustad med plysch, all el och en rejäl baslåda där bak. Gick som en dröm i de värmländska skogarna tidigt 2000-tal. -----------------

Vi løfter en vigtig samfundsopgave! Vi ser ind i en fremtid med mangel på SOSU-hjælpere og SOSU-assistenter. Samtidig møder vi mange nye borgere i Danmark med både kompetencer og lyst til at bidrage. Hos AOF Job & Dansk kobler vi sprogundervisning, vejledning og konkrete jobmuligheder. Det gør vejen til arbejdsmarkedet kortere og giver kursisterne mulighed for at bringe deres kompetencer i spil. Vi er stolte af at være en del af løsningen på arbejdsmarkedets behov 💪 https://lnkd.in/en6DcEQz

Treating AI rollout as a regular tool deployment is a category error. In their new Skills Intelligence Report, Docebo found that: ➡️ for almost 30% of their respondents, AI tooling budgets grew faster than AI enablement. ➡️ 7% said the enablement budget was cut to fund AI tooling. ➡️ 47% said their headcount budget was redirected to other priorities, AI tools among them. Read that again (I needed to a few times). I know AI likes to use the phrase *stopped me in my tracks*, but I’m writing this myself, and this phrase does apply here 🙃 All the promised AI riches assume business transformation, but the way organisations fund and approach enablement often treats it as a straightforward technology rollout. It’s not. More sophisticated uses of AI often mean people have to develop their own use cases, rethink their day-to-day roles and ways of working, and develop complementary skills and expertise. They also have to navigate the potential upheaval around professional identity, the value of their expertise, job security, and ethical concerns, to name a few. Then there’s the next layer of the onion: the environment created by leaders over years and translated by managers into the daily work experience. When I work on these questions with my own clients, the t-words (tools & training) are a given. The bigger challenge keeping them up at night is everything around the t’s: changing work and thinking habits, solving job design and coordination, making it rational for people to integrate AI into their context, keeping work sustainable, preparing leaders to lead their teams through this turmoil for years to come. The transformation that AI requires is a different category of work. Investing crazy money in tooling but not in enablement is madness 😶

Depois de anos esse continua sendo o processo capaz de gerar muito mais leads, clientes e negócios mais rápido aqui na plataforma. Eu chamo de Funil Social Selling. Se você ainda não fez nada parecido, agende 30 minutos para conhecer ou entender como eu posso implementar para você no link: https://lnkd.in/dgPvq75u

Se há uma competência que se tornou mais importante do que nunca na era da IA, é o pensamento crítico. E não é apenas uma competência humana, é uma competência crítica para o negócio! No dia 28 de outubro, a GoodHabitz promove mais uma GoodTalkz, subordinada ao tema "O pensamento crítico na era da IA”, onde vamos ter o José Maria Pimentel professor de pensamento crítico e autor do podcast 45 Graus. 📅 28 de outubro | ⏰ 10:00–11:30 💻 Online e gratuito Uma sessão imperdível para líderes, gestores, decisores, profissionais de RH e L&D — e para qualquer profissional que queira tomar melhores decisões na era da IA. Inscreva-se aqui: https://lnkd.in/e_3yqAjc Até lá!

Hvordan sætter du retningen for AI, kommunikerer den og måler på den? Det har været nogle fornøjelige dage i studiet med David Guldager. Vi er gået i gang med at skyde næste del i kursusrækken ‘Strategisk AI’ på GoLearn.dk . Sammen med David og en stærk opstilling af eksperter vil jeg pege AI-pilen hen, hvor den hører til: I ledelseslokalet. De nye kurser handler om tre ting: → At sætte retningen selv i stedet for at reagere på omverdenens forventninger på bagkant. → At kommunikere AI-forandringen, så den lander i hele organisationen. → At måle den reelle effekt. Og med effekt mener jeg ikke, hvor mange der bruger Copilot, eller hvor mange dashboards der er lavet med Claude Cowork. Jeg mener, hvordan AI påvirker virksomhedens produkter og services, strategiske mål og måske endda eksistensgrundlag. Der kommer masser af indhold løbende med konkrete værktøjer til (forandrings)ledelse. Der er stadig pladser i holdopstillingen, så byd gerne ind med dine bud på eksperter, jeg skal have med.

Interim Manager sind die Feuerwehr der Wirtschaft. Sie kommen, wenn es brennt. Letzten Samstag habe ich am Comer See mit Holger Rosemann darüber gesprochen, was passiert, wenn diese Feuerwehr KI im Gepäck hat. Die Antwort: mehr, als die meisten denken. Mich hat überrascht, wie weit KI im Interim Management bereits angekommen ist. Nicht irgendwann. Jetzt. Was ich mitnehme: 1. KI ist ein Werkzeug für Tempo. Wer in fremden Unternehmen startet, hat keine Zeit für monatelange Analysen. KI verkürzt den Weg vom Chaos zum Überblick. 2. Die Use Cases sind greifbar. Dokumente auswerten, Prozesse verstehen, Entscheidungen vorbereiten. Alltag, keine Vision. 3. Der Mensch trägt die Verantwortung. KI liefert Vorschläge. Entscheiden müssen Menschen, gerade auf Zeit. 4. Wissen aufbauen, statt abhängig zu werden. Die besten Interim Manager hinterlassen ein Team, das die Werkzeuge selbst beherrscht. Interim Management war schon immer Wissenstransfer auf Zeit. KI macht diesen Transfer schneller, wenn man sie richtig einsetzt. Meine Frage an euch: Wo würdet ihr als Erstes KI einsetzen, wenn ihr heute als Interim Manager in ein Unternehmen kommt?

Jeder spricht über KI-Agenten, wir gehen next Level und klonen den CEO. Vier Keynotes in fünf Tagen. Gestern in Frankfurt. Und die Frage, die alle bewegt hat, war nicht: Was können KI-Agenten? Sondern: Was kommt danach? Auf dem Frankfurt Finance & Future Summit habe ich mit Entscheidern aus Industrie und Wirtschaft genau darüber gesprochen. Und gezeigt, wie das technisch aussieht. Meine Frage an euch: Was glaubt ihr, kommt nach einem „Klon“ ?

New York, let’s have dinner. 🍝 On Tuesday, November 10, we’re bringing the Bites Roadshow to NYC for an evening at Trattoria Dell’Arte’s Candle Room, right across from Carnegie Hall. The idea is simple: one long table and a room full of executives from leading companies who care about how frontline teams learn, grow, and perform. No slides. No pitch decks. Just real conversation about what’s working, what isn’t, and the pain points we’re all trying to solve. Some of the best ideas I’ve heard came from exactly these kinds of evenings, from people sharing notes from the trenches over a good meal. We kept it small on purpose, and only a few seats are still open. If you lead operations, L&D, HR, or frontline teams and want to join us, grab your seat at the 1st comment >>> And if someone in your network belongs at this table, tag them below👇 #FrontlineWorkforce #Leadership #NYC #FrontlineLearning #Bites

Gør AI dig bedre til dit arbejde? Eller kan du få mere ud af det? De fleste jeg taler med i Life Science branchen bruger AI, men mange føler de kunne få mere gavn af det - uden helt at vide hvordan. Kom og lær hvordan du får AI til at gøre dig bedre til dit arbejde den 24. november. Sidst vi holdt kurset 'Bliv bedre til dit arbejde i Pharma' skabte en af deltagerne sin egen compliance agent, der kan tjekke marketing materialer. En anden kreerede et beslutningsstøtteværktøj baseret på egne værdier og input fra tre eksperter og flere andre lavede agenter, der lettede hverdagens opgaver med mails, referater og præsentationer. Tag dine opgaver med og få værktøjer og vejledning i at løse dem med AI fra dygtige Natasja Christensen, som til dagligt underviser Leo Pharmas medarbejdere globalt i brugen af AI og desuden er en del af Connected Women in AI sammen med erfarne Pernille Kjæmpe, som deler værktøjer og indsigt fra sit arbejde med AI i Novo Nordisk's Global Corporate Affairs. Tag en af dine fysiske kolleger med gratis (I betaler kun for én deltager) – så kan I sammen hjælpe hinanden og andre i jeres organisation bagefter. Tak til Maibritt Thoft-Christensen for muligheden for at lade mig skabe lige de kurser til Life Science, som jeg brænder for :) Det er i Atrium Copenhagen den 24. november og online den 30. november. Læs mere her: https://lnkd.in/e_FFBPQF Ps. Skriv dine LinkedIn-In opslag selv ligesom mig. På kurset lærer jeg dig, hvordan du kan bruge AI til at skabe bedre opslag på SoMe, men stadig skrive dem selv, så folk gider læse dem og får noget ud af dem.

Whether it’s America’s foreign policy or AI’s impacts, following global affairs can be dizzying. The first task for anyone trying to keep a level head is deciding what’s important and how it changes (or doesn’t) the big picture. The next, not least for business leaders on Economist Education’s geopolitics course, is analysing what that means for their organisation, and acting. The programme aims to help—and thankfully, our executive students tell us it does. The approach is to focus on fundamentals, not fleeting headlines, in materials written and recently updated by The Economist’s journalists, who also appear in videos and podcasts alongside other experts. Our accomplished students discuss global issues in online forums, and are prompted to consider how to apply what they learn. That could be in anything from investment decisions to supply-chain management. In case this sounds useful to you, a new run of the course starts soon. Please click below for further details. https://lnkd.in/e_PWwEZ4

LA Checklist GEO (et SEO) Les experts Matchers pratiquent chaque jour ce qu'ils enseignent. Et de temps en temps, ils produisent des contenus qui valent vraiment le détour. Jordan Goussery est expert SEO & IA et depuis 2018. Il a rédigé pour Matchers une Checklist SEO + GEO 2026 : 36 points de contrôle concrets pour savoir si votre entreprise est réellement visible dans Google… et dans les moteurs IA comme ChatGPT, Perplexity ou Gemini. Depuis juillet 2026, vos prospects ne cherchent plus seulement dans Google. Ils posent des questions à une IA et la réponse cite quelques noms. Est-ce que le vôtre en fait partie ? En 6 blocs et 90 jours de plan daction, Jordan vous donne un cap clair. Téléchargez la checklist gratuitement ici → https://urls.fr/5kJKQX Et partagez, of course.

I can finally talk about this. We’ve been showing Cue privately, and the reactions have made keeping it quiet considerably harder. So we’re making it official at UNLEASH Paris. Meet Cue. Our AI performance agent. Every business wants its people to work differently. Lead better. Use AI effectively. Win more business. But between announcing the priority and changing what people actually do, there’s a lot of hoping, reminding and chasing. You can’t PowerPoint your way through that last mile. I’ve tried. Lovely slides, though. Cue starts with the work. It connects to the tools your teams already use, spots the knowledge, skill and behaviour gaps holding people back, and acts to close them. That could mean feedback on their work, 1:1 AI tutoring, a roleplay built around a real conversation, or the exact five minutes of a course they need. No one had to author that tutoring session or roleplay. Cue created it for that person, grounded in your company’s own knowledge and verified external expertise. Then it follows up to see what changes. That’s what I’m excited about. Support that keeps going, person by person, without someone having to organise every step. Cue works natively with HowNow's learning platform, or you can buy it standalone and connect it to your existing stack. I’m super proud of the team behind it, and very ready to show you. Coming to UNLEASH? Come and see us at the HowNow stand. Message me and we’ll find a time. #UNLEASHWorld #AI #FutureOfWork

제품 전략(Product Strategy)을 잘한다는 건? 👉 팀이 "이 기능을 왜 지금 만드는가"를 명확하게 하며, 또렷한 목적지를 바라보게 하는 것. 최근 신제품(0 to 1)의 PM을 겸임하게 되었습니다. 대략 4개 정도의 직무를 동시에 하고 있었는데 이제 5개가 되었죠. 😅 오랜만에 PM을 겸한 김에, 꽤 자주 같이 일한 개발자 분께 저에 대한 피드백을 부탁드렸습니다. 그런데 그 답변이 제가 생각하는 '제품 전략의 역할'을 너무나 선명하게 설명해주셔서 글을 써보려합니다. 1️⃣ 제품 성공의 공식 적자 -800억 토스증권 을 해외주식 1등으로 만들고, 이미 1600만명이 넘는 토스 전체의 MAU 장벽을 깨부수는 과정에서 제가 깨달은 공식이 있습니다. 제품 성공은 아래의 상황에서 만들어집니다. "매 실행마다 러닝을 얻어가면서 반복적으로 집요하게 실행한다" 제품 성공은 [분석 -> 실행 -> 성공]처럼 선형적으로 발생하지 않습니다. 매 실행마다 러닝을 얻어서 조금씩 나아가는 양성 피드백 과정입니다. 실제 성공으로 가는 구조는 이렇습니다. [실행 -> 러닝 (방향조정) -> 실행 -> 러닝 (방향조정) -> ... -> 성공] 2️⃣ 제품팀의 현실 이상은 그렇지만 현실은 괴리가 있습니다. 그 이유는 보통 DA와 PO의 이분법적 역할 분리에 있습니다. 사람들은 [분석 -> 실행 -> 성공] 이런 선형적 과정을 기대하기 때문에, 분석-> 실행은 DA가 실행 -> 성공은 PO가 맡는다고 기대하고 있습니다. 그리고 그건 처참히 틀렸습니다. 그건 클래스101에서 수백명의 DA와 PO의 커리어 설문조사를 해본 결과에서 선명히 드러납니다. DA와 PO의 입장은 다음과 같습니다. 🗣️ DA : 내 분석은 실행이 안돼. 나는 추출만해. 🗣️ PO : 내 실행은 성공이 안돼. 대체 어떻게 성공해. 괴리가 생기는 이유는 제품 성공의 공식을 보면 알 수 있습니다. "매 실행마다 러닝을 얻어가면서 반복적으로 집요하게 실행한다" DA는 분석을 통해 러닝을 얻지 못했고, PO는 러닝을 기반으로 실행하지 못했고, 둘은 실행에서 러닝을 얻지 못했기 때문입니다. 끝없이 러닝이 빠져있습니다. 아무리 반복적이라도/아무리 집요해도 러닝을 얻지못하면 팀은 제자리를 맴돌 뿐입니다. 3️⃣ 러닝이란 무엇인가? 러닝이라는 것은 우리가 인과가 명확한 진실을 알게되는 것을 의미하지 않습니다. 그보다 덜 과학적이고, 더 내러티브에 가깝습니다. 정량적 진실은 필요하지 않을 때가 많습니다. 매주 우리는 러닝이 필요합니다. - "위시리스트 기능, 개발하는 게 좋을지. 그걸 어떻게 알지…?" 모호한 상황은 비즈니스에 일반적입니다. 러닝은 이런 것입니다. - "대체적으로 구매전환율은 같은 상품을 여러번 볼 수록 높아진다. 그러나 현재 재진입을 하는 유저들은 홈의 추천 시스템의 의해서 자신이 봤던 상품을 잘 찾아가는 것으로 보인다. 우리의 팀에 대기된 액션 아이템 목록중에 같은 상품을 다시 보게할 수 있는 아이템이 더 많으며 모델링 해본 결과 임팩트 차이가 큰 것이 있어보인다. 따라서 위시리스트 기능은 우선순위가 낮다" 4️⃣ 제품 전략의 정의 제가 정의하는 제품 전략은 다음과 같습니다. "팀을 매 실행마다 올바른 러닝을 얻어주면서, 반복적으로 집요하게 실행하도록 만드는 것" 여기서 올바르다는 건, '맞다'가 아닙니다. 보다 덜 과학적인 이야기입니다. 저는 제품전략에 러닝 뿐만 아니라 반복실행까지 포괄합니다. (아무리 좋은 러닝을 줘도, PO가 그걸 믿고 집요하게 실행하지 않으면 팀은 나아가지 못하거든요) 제품전략을 뛰어나게 수행하면, 매번의 실행마다 팀은 세상이 선명해지는 경험을 합니다. 고객에 대한 이해가 올라가고, 제품에 대한 이해, 산업에 대한 이해, 심지어는 인간 그 자체에 대한 이해가 올라갑니다. (믿으셔도 됩니다. 저는 토스증권에서 대니얼 카너먼의 전망이론을 실험으로 증명하기 까지했거든요. 그리고 그게 향후 모든 실험과 제품의 거대한 MAU 증분을 만들었습니다) 이건 단순히, Data-Driven Decision과는 다릅니다. 그건 러닝을 얻는 법의 일부일 뿐이죠. 제품 전략을 잘 해내면 그 결과 동료들은 이런 체험을 하게 됩니다. 👉 "이 기능을 왜 지금 만드는지"가 명확한 상태로 일을 하는 경험. 선명한 현재 상태가 팀에 공유되니 모두가 같은 선 위에 서게 되고, 또렷한 목적지를 함께 바라보니 흔들리지 않고 똑바로 나아갈 수 있습니다. 이건 제가 주장하는게 아닙니다. 제가 10년간 개발을 해오신 분께 피드백이죠. 5️⃣ 제품 전략은 제품 성공을 위해 존재합니다. 제품 전략은 현학적인 학문이 아니라, 제품 성공을 위해 존재하는 '전략'입니다. 그리고 저는 단언컨데, 한국에 이 분야를 저보다 집요하게 고민하고 정의하고 정리한 사람은 없다고 생각합니다. 이유는 간단합니다. 한국 제품 문화의 정점이라고 할 수 있는 토스에서, DA와 PO로 모두 Growth를 성공시켜봤고, 그 두개의 경험을 하쳐서 "제품 전략 매니저"라는 직군을 직접 만들었습니다. 전 계열사 2000명 중 유일하게 혼자 그 직무를 수행했습니다. 현재는 클래스101에서 "제품 전략 리드"를 맡고 있습니다. 저는 제 성공이 우연일까 끝없이 불안했고, '재현가능성'에 집착하면서 끝없이 정리하고 프레임워크화 시켰습니다. 토스에는 여전히 제가 만든 모델과 자료들이 학습 자료로 쓰이고 있고, 클래스101에서는 모든 데이터의 흐름과 접근법이 저의 기준으로 만들어져있습니다. 제가 생각하는 제품 전략 프레임워크가 궁금하신가요? 10월 25일 일요일 저녁 8시에, 유투브 생중계로 웨비나를 진행합니다. 관심있으신 분들은 참여해주세요. 그날 제가 진행하는 프로그램에 대한 소개도 드리겠습니다. 댓글에 오픈카톡방 링크 남겨놓겠습니다. Q&A도 진행하니 관심있으신 DA, PO분들은 편하게 참여해주세요. (웨비나는 당연히 무료입니다) "내 분석은 실행되지 않아", "대체 어떻게 성공을 만들지?"라는 고민이 있다면 환영합니다.

The 7taps Microlearning design and dev team shipped 𝗺𝗼𝗿𝗲 𝘁𝗵𝗮𝗻 𝟱𝟬 𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗿𝗼𝘃𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁𝘀 in September! Here are a few you’ll notice right away. The biggest addition is workspaces. Large companies can now bring departments together under one account, with shared administration while each team keeps its own content and access. Polls now support multiple answers and the option to keep results private. And learners can now click to enlarge images on mobile and desktop, making detailed screenshots and diagrams easier to read. Some changes get the announcement. Others make your day a little easier every time you use 7taps. Both matter. To the 7taps team, thank you for the care that goes into both. And to our customers, your feedback drove many of this month’s updates. Keep it coming! Our September blog post shares the customer requests and creative workarounds behind these updates. Link in the comments.

Compliance training gets judged by completion rates. But the real test doesn't happen in the training module. It happens at 4:55pm on a Friday, when an email lands with a risk decision attached and nobody's around to ask. Ticking a box tells you someone sat through the content. It doesn't tell you what they'll do when the decision is theirs alone, under time pressure, with a client on the other end. Legal cover comes from the checkbox but good judgment comes from somewhere else. That's the part most training programs never touch.

Its been almost a week since the close of the National Association for College Admission Counseling conference. My Human Capital Education colleague, John Haller, and I came away with 3 questions (and some sassy stickers) for this 3-minute read. https://lnkd.in/ggFW_Rp2

Seit über 25 Jahren bin ich in der Cybersecurity-Branche tätig. Und noch immer sitzen bei vielen Gelegenheiten deutlich mehr Männer als Frauen mit am Tisch. Dabei kenne ich so viele Frauen, die diese Branche mit ihrer Expertise prägen. Sie leiten Unternehmen, forschen, entwickeln Sicherheitsstrategien und gelten als Koryphäen ihres Fachs. Ihre Meinung ist gefragt, ihre Arbeit geschätzt und ihr Wissen wertvoll für die gesamte Branche. Und trotzdem sind Frauen in Führungspositionen noch immer unterrepräsentiert, in der Cybersecurity wie in vielen anderen Branchen. Die #FemaleVisionGala in Bochum hat mir das einmal mehr vor Augen geführt. Ein großartiges Event mit mehr als 300 Gästen und vielen inspirierenden Frauen, die ihren beruflichen Weg gehen – und sich dabei oft mehr Hürden stellen müssen als ihre männlichen Kollegen. In spannenden Vorträgen und interessanten Panels standen an diesem Abend die Themen „Mut und Macht“ sowie weibliche Perspektiven auf Führung, Medien, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft im Mittelpunkt. Und das völlig zu Recht! Denn wir wissen: Unterschiedliche Perspektiven und vielfältige Teams sind ein Gewinn. Sie erweitern den Blick, hinterfragen Gewohntes und schaffen Raum für bessere Lösungen. Warum also entscheiden sich noch immer so wenige Frauen für eine Führungsposition? Welches Bild vermitteln wir von Karriere, Familie und Verantwortung? Und zeigen wir ausreichend, wie vielfältig berufliche Wege und Aufstiegsmöglichkeiten sein können? Für mich hat dieser Abend auch wieder eines deutlich gemacht: Nicht warten, bis man gefragt wird. Nicht kleiner machen, als man ist. Nicht vergessen, anderen Frauen Türen zu öffnen. Ein herzliches Dankeschön an Sören Bauer für die Premiere der #FemaleVisionGala des Face-Club.com in Bochum. Bei G DATA CyberDefense wurden mehr als 300 Gäste mit einem großartigen Programm, inspirierenden Impulsen und wichtigen Gesprächen zusammengebracht. Und als Mentorin frage ich an dieser Stelle: Wann hast du das letzte Mal aktiv eine Frau weiterempfohlen? Viele tun das längst ganz selbstverständlich. Danke an alle, die an diesem Abend da waren und schon heute Türen öffnen, zum Beispiel Prof. Dr. Anja Seng Gerburg Hothum Katja Schnabel Jessika Lüning Dr. Judith Brenneis Veronika Prühs Karin Busnel-Knappertsbusch Nike Schröder Isabella Herzig Anke Tsitouras Dr. Ghesal Fahimi-Steingraeber Hanna-Marie Hofmann Esther Filly Anett Mehler-Bicher Dagmar Zimmermann Chiara Falke-Lanksch Christine Zillmer Gaby Hauptmann

My prediction for 2027: more companies will build learning around how their people work, not how the LMS works. The LMS is a great tool for a lot of employees. But there’s a gap between everyone who has a login and everyone it reliably reaches. If you’re working a shift, serving customers or moving between job sites, logging into the LMS might not fit easily into your day. That doesn’t make your learning needs any less important. Curated courses aren’t disappearing in 2027 (or 2028). And in-person facilitated learning is still the gold standard for plenty of things. I expect to see more companies keeping what works and adding ways to deliver and track learning for the people they’re struggling to reach. That’s a big part of what we’re building at 7taps Microlearning. Your LMS may serve some people really well. We want to help you reach everyone. Who are you struggling to reach?

Dear compliance managers, stop focusing on teaching the rules. Most people can tell you what the rules are. That's not the same as applying them when a real decision shows up. Behavior under pressure doesn't follow the same logic as a knowledge test, the same person can pass the quiz and still freeze, or guess wrong, when it actually counts. The training that works combines both. Simulation for the judgment call, e-learning for the knowledge check. They test different things, and skipping one to lean harder on the other just moves the gap somewhere else. None of this requires gamification to land. Effective and engaging are two different questions, and only one of them determines whether someone makes the right call. #compliance #gamification #seriousgames