B2B ad examples

Nuestra experiencia protegiendo a grandes empresas brasileñas está ahora al servicio de su negocio en España. Consultoría, monitorización y respuesta a incidentes con tecnología de vanguardia y un equipo altamente especializado. Conozca nuestro porfolio y descubra cómo podemos proteger su empresa: https://lnkd.in/d_6BABeV

Somos el Grupo NTSec: referencia en soluciones de ciberseguridad que combinan tecnología avanzada con un soporte especializado. Llegamos a España para ofrecer protección total frente a las amenazas digitales. Conozca nuestro porfolio completo: https://lnkd.in/d_6BABeV

With 80% of breaches involving identity takeovers, can your IAM program withstand today's threats?

Identity is not just about access—it's about securing your entire business." Discover the identity-first approach.

Unlock new possibilities in cyber and physical security.

🛡️ 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐛𝐲 𝐇𝐢𝐥𝐥𝐬𝐭𝐫𝐨𝐧𝐠 - 𝐓𝐚𝐤𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐘𝐨𝐮 𝐅𝐫𝐨𝐦 𝐕𝐢𝐬𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐭𝐨 𝐕𝐞𝐫𝐢𝐟𝐢𝐞𝐝 𝐀𝐜𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 In industrial environments globally, security teams often have the roadmap: frameworks, policies, and risk assessments are all in place. Yet, scaling execution across dozens, or hundreds, of sites remains a challenge. 𝐑𝐞𝐬𝐢𝐥𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐜𝐥𝐨𝐬𝐞𝐬 𝐭𝐡𝐚𝐭 𝐞𝐱𝐞𝐜𝐮𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧 𝐠𝐚𝐩. It brings the structured expertise of seasoned consultants, like governance logic, BIA alignment, and criticality tiering, into an intuitive, software-driven system. That means less chaos, smoother rollouts, and clear visibility into what’s happening, where it matters most, and why. 🔍 Discover how Resilion empowers action at scale, 𝐰𝐢𝐭𝐡𝐨𝐮𝐭 𝐢𝐧𝐜𝐫𝐞𝐚𝐬𝐢𝐧𝐠 𝐲𝐨𝐮𝐫 𝐡𝐞𝐚𝐝𝐜𝐨𝐮𝐧𝐭: Visit www.hillstrongsecurity.com today!

Boost physical security while reducing workload. Hakimo monitors every camera in real time and alerts your team only when it matters, helping affordable housing communities stay safer without adding staff or stretching budgets. With automated threat detection and fewer false alarms, your team can focus on residents while Hakimo handles the heavy lifting 24/7.

Your competitors are still Googling "what is ISO 42001." You? You've got the checklist. 6 steps covering everything from AI risk management to audit-ready documentation. Built for teams who'd rather get certified than stress about it.

AI governance feels manageable until someone says the word "audit." Then it's papers flying, policies missing, and everyone asking who owns what. Sound familiar? This checklist exists so you never have to live that moment. 6 steps. Clear structure. Actual calm.

HITRUST simplifies RFP and procurement processes. Stop friction between risk and business units by leveraging standardized, reusable assurances. See how incorporating validated assessments improves throughput and minimizes rework.

Your TPRM process is slower and more manual than it should be. Inefficiency costs 8-20 hours of low-value work per vendor. Get the executive insights to replace manual systems with a scalable assurance program.

Asset Maintenance Pros share their experience after implementing Hakimo, and the results speak for themselves. The Impact: - 66% reduction in security costs (from $200K+ to ~$68K annually) - Real-time threat detection and response - Faster coordination with law enforcement - Better resident experience AI is redefining property security helping operators do more with less, while keeping communities safer. Curious about how AI could work to secure your properties? Let's talk. #PropertySecurity #AIInnovation #SecuritySolutions #PhysicalSecurity

IDC’s latest report highlights how SOC-as-a-Service is reshaping cybersecurity in the GCC. The research reveals why talent shortages, underutilized tools, and reactive defenses demand a new model. Discover how CPX × Microsoft delivers this IDC-validated approach to protect governments and critical industries.

Where does AI pay off most in security? Our new report explores the growth of AI agents and reveals top AI use cases in the security space.

The Cybersecurity Forecast 2026 is here. See what Google & Mandiant experts predict for AI, nation-state threats, and the cybercrime economy.

Más herramientas no garantizan más seguridad. Gracias a playbooks inteligentes y IA, nuestro GMS SOC Lite reduce falsos positivos >80%, prioriza incidentes y libera a tu equipo de alertas irrelevantes. Maximiza eficiencia y protege tus activos. Conoce la solución con un demo gratuito.

A single mobile security gap can trigger fines, audits, and reputational damage. Most financial services teams miss mobile vulnerabilities because outdated devices, unsupported OS versions, and the inability to prove data security. The result? Rework, delayed releases, and costly audit remediation. Corellium helps financial institutions eliminate technical debt with virtual iOS devices that provide root-level access, version-accurate testing, and compliance-ready visibility—without maintaining expensive device labs. Modernize your mobile testing before it costs more than your testing budget. Schedule a meeting to learn how.

No more iPhone jailbreaks. 🚫📱 With iOS 26 blocking physical access, many financial app teams are left testing at the surface—right where fraud, data leakage, and compliance gaps hide. Corellium gives banks and fintechs full root-level visibility, OS version coverage, and automation—without the risk, overhead, or policy issues of physical devices. See how financial institutions are upgrading mobile security testing (and retiring device labs for good). Book a meeting 👇

De miles de alertas, solo el 23% son de alta criticidad. A través de fuentes de inteligencia integradas, nuestro GMS SOC Lite detecta lo realmente importante y previene crisis operativas antes de que impacten tu negocio.

Our latest GreyNoise research is out — the 2026 GreyNoise State of the Edge Report, covering H2 2025. The finding that keeps coming up in every conversation: 52% of remote code execution attempts came from IPs with no prior history in GreyNoise data 😮. More than half of the most dangerous exploitation hitting internet-facing infrastructure came from IPs with no prior history in GreyNoise data — infrastructure that may not appear on reputation feeds until after the exploitation attempt. But one chart 📊 in particular stopped us \(attached\). It shows CVE exploitation volume broken down by vulnerability age. The pattern is hard to ignore: pre-2015 CVEs — vulnerabilities over a decade old — generated 7.3 million exploitation sessions. That's 4x more than 2023-2024 CVEs combined, though one 26-year-old vulnerability \(CVE-1999-0526, X Server\) accounts for the majority. Even excluding it, Shellshock and PHP-CGI continue generating measurable traffic a decade later. The conventional wisdom is that patching programs should focus on the newest vulnerabilities first. The data tells a different story. Public exploit code for these vulnerabilities has been available for years, and the sustained traffic suggests they remain effective against systems that have quietly accumulated outside the patch cycle. Three other findings from the report that warrant attention: 👀 A residential botnet grew from 2,000 to 300,000 IPs in 72 days — a 150x increase, 73% residential. IP-based blocking, reputation scoring, and per-source rate limiting have limited effectiveness against this model. ‼️ Palo Alto GlobalProtect absorbed 16.7 million sessions — more than 3.5x Cisco and Fortinet combined. That notable concentration warrants investigation — whether it reflects available tooling, exposed attack surface, or targeted campaigns. 👿 A single hosting provider \(UCLOUD\) accounted for more malicious sessions than AWS and Azure combined — 14% of all observed sessions from one ASN. The full report 📓 covers edge infrastructure targeting, infrastructure concentration patterns, AI/LLM attack surface emergence, and actionable recommendations for security leadership and operations teams. Read the full research report here: https://lnkd.in/e8dueWPT Always happy to discuss or answer questions about the data — drop a line at [email protected].

Security tools that can't adapt to your environment tend to create one of two outcomes: teams work around them, or they get replaced. A file handling policy that's appropriate for a classified government network is far too restrictive for a financial services firm processing thousands of customer documents a day. A configuration built for a cloud-native SaaS platform doesn't translate cleanly to an air-gapped operational network. When a tool forces a choice between the protection it can offer and the operational reality of your environment, that tension doesn't go away — it just gets resolved informally, usually in favor of keeping workflows moving. The problem with one-size-fits-all security isn't that it's wrong for every organization. It's that it's precise for none of them. And the gaps it creates are often invisible until something goes wrong. Glasswall CDR is built around granular policy management. Security teams configure exactly how file components are handled during the CDR process — what gets removed, what gets repaired, what the acceptable output looks like for that specific environment. Those policies can be set to match compliance requirements, operational constraints and risk tolerance without overhauling what's already in place. That level of control is particularly important in high-assurance environments where compliance mandates are specific and documented. But it matters in any environment where the right level of protection differs by workflow, by user group or by the sensitivity of the data involved. Protection that fits your environment is protection that actually gets used.

Security tools that don't connect to your existing stack create new gaps to manage. With 300+ native connections, Glasswall CDR extends protection across the infrastructure you already have.

An S/4 program runs on elevated access — the migration work itself needs broad permissions, and cutover and hypercare push emergency access higher still. That's a long stretch where privileged activity is heavy and easy to lose track of. Firefighter access that's time-boxed and monitored, with the audit trail written automatically, keeps the program moving without leaving a gap to reconstruct later.

SAP IDM handled provisioning and lifecycle — not segregation of duties. The access risk and SoD analysis you need has always lived in a separate GRC tool. A move off SAP IDM is the moment to bring identity lifecycle and access risk analysis onto one platform, so conflicts are quantified and remediated where access is managed, instead of adding yet another tool to the stack.