Surety Systems ads

How many tools is your organization paying for that do the same thing? If you've been through an acquisition in the last five years, the answer is more than you think. Both sides kept renewing. Nobody reconciled the contracts.

How much of your finance team's time goes to reconciling data that should already match? Research puts it at 75%. That's not a software cost, it's a people cost. And it traces directly back to systems that don't talk to each other.

$12.9M. That's the average annual cost of poor data quality. Your ERP says one thing while your reporting tool says another. Your chart of accounts has three versions across three teams, and none of them tie together. That's not a process problem, it's an architecture problem.

Same item. Different codes. Depends on which system you check. Someone built a crosswalk to translate between them, and it worked for a while. But, now nobody owns it, and your finance team spends every close cycle reconciling what should have been clean from the start.

Your ERP bundle almost certainly includes capability your organization already owns somewhere else. Another department is probably paying for it separately. The bigger the portfolio, the more overlap hides. This guide breaks down why and what to do about it.

One department buys a planning tool. Another department already has one. Neither knows about the other. When purchasing is decentralized, overlap is inevitable. This guide breaks down where the overlap hides and what to do about it.