SensorUp Inc. ads

Software developers don't wear impact gloves. Your crews do. 🧤 That is why you're losing half your 30-day compliance window to data lag. In our latest session, James Garten (Manzer Environmental) and Kayla Ball (SensorUp) connected the dots between "bad buttons" and "missed deadlines." The Field Reality: As James put it: "For every half second you spend on an extra button... over the course of a day, it tallies up." The Compliance Risk: That friction creates a data lag. "When you have 30 days to make a repair, and it takes 2 weeks to get a report... that might only leave you a week to fix it." The Fix: We broke down how Manzer designed their workflow to solve for the "Glove Test," resulting in reports that hit the office in 24 to 72 hours—not weeks. Stop fighting the interface. Start beating the clock.

Emission event closures running past 30 days fell from 1/2 to one in 10. For one upstream operator, the repair window stopped slipping. Same survey program, same detection volume. Read what changed.

After a repair, the question is whether it holds. For one upstream operator, only 21% of repaired equipment was emitting again in the next detection campaign. Same survey program, same detection volume. Read what changed.

Crews were being dispatched to third-party and divested assets. For one upstream operator, false alarms fell from 39% to 19%. Same survey program, same detection volume. Read what changed.

For one upstream operator, the median time to close an emission event fell from 27 days to 7. The slowest cases fell from 180 days to 20. Every observation that reached the desk was already attributed to a piece of equipment, with repeats correlated into one event. Same survey program, same detection volume. Read what changed.

855 unnecessary dispatches eliminated. 66% fewer alerts in year one. Same field team, better data. Real operational results from 22,000 wells. Let's talk →