Omada ads

76% of security leaders believe identity security is core to their strategy. Yet visibility and governance have not kept pace with scale. There's a gap between confidence and execution, and the data shows exactly where. Download The State of Identity Governance 2026 to see where the industry stands.

Identity Governance is changing faster than ever before. For instance, non-human identities now outnumber human identities in most enterprises. This is one of nine findings in The State of Identity Governance 2026, based on primary research with identity and security leaders. Download your copy and see where the industry stands.

Many organizations make the mistake of underappreciating how flexible most roles are. That directly affects their governance patterns. The typical idea of having a job and being put in a position to do one specific thing is really getting blurred. People are doing many different things in their roles, and the data behind that is very hard to collect, refine, and maintain. So what happens? Companies oversimplify it. And that can make sense when you're trying to get an IGA solution operational, but you're setting yourself up for limitations going forward. That granular data is what you need to build meaningful policy and automation around. We see a real disconnect between the data in an organization's HR system and the actual work people are doing. When ILM processes & policies have more exceptions than rules, that's usually a symptom of your data and your organization not being aligned. The result: slower onboarding, weaker governance, and growing access creep. What does the gap between HR data and real work look like in your organization? #IdentityGovernance #DataQuality #IGA #AccessManagement #DigitalTransformation

85% of enterprise organisations are already deploying or piloting agentic AI. Most have not yet adapted their governance models to match. The State of Identity Governance 2026 reveals the gap between where organisations are and where they need to be. Download the report.

Multi-affiliation is a layer on top of contextual identity governance that many organizations miss. It puts an abstraction between the identity and its relationships to the organization, and those relationships are typically described as contracts. Why does that matter? Because people can have multiple legally binding reasons for being in a company. In healthcare, someone can work as a doctor every day while also participating in a research project. Those are two different contracts, each with their own context and their own lifecycle. Without multi-affiliation, you see one identity with a lot of access and no way to trace where it came from. You assigned access to a relationship, but you can't confirm which relationship it belongs to. With multi-affiliation, every piece of access traces back to a specific contractual obligation with a defined binding period. When one contract ends, only the access tied to that contract gets revoked. We see this in mostly in healthcare, academia, and facility management, but any complex enterprise faces the same challenge. Does your organization have clear traceability between access and the contractual reason behind it? #IdentityGovernance #MultiAffiliation #ContextualGovernance #Healthcare #Compliance

Permissions are granted, but rarely removed. Ownership becomes unclear. Risk builds, often without anyone noticing. For enterprise IT and security teams, this is the identity governance challenge. See how Omada helps leading organisations bring visibility, control, and accountability to every identity: human, agentic, and non-human.