OLI ads

OLI has officially launched TrueCORR, introducing a new approach to continuous corrosion intelligence and asset integrity management. Corrosion risk evolves as plant operating conditions change, often in ways that physical corrosion coupons and sensors cannot fully capture. This can leave asset operators with limited visibility into where risk is developing and make it harder to identify emerging concerns before they become asset integrity issues. At the heart of TrueCORR are Virtual Corrosion Coupons, connecting live plant data with OLI’s first-principles corrosion models to provide continuous insight at critical locations across an asset. The launch marks an important step in bringing more than 55 years of OLI chemistry expertise directly into real-time operations. Read the full announcement: https://lnkd.in/euqqMmH7

OLI TrueCORR will be introduced in a live broadcast on September 23, hosted by television presenter, journalist and newsreader Sameena Ali-Khan alongside experts from OLI. Through an operating scenario, we’ll show how changing process conditions can alter corrosion risk and how seeing the chemistry behind those changes can support better asset integrity decisions. 11:00 AM EDT | 4:00 PM BST | 7:00 PM GST Join the broadcast at olitruecorr.com

What if you could see corrosion risk differently? OLI has developed a new approach to corrosion intelligence, designed to give engineers and decision makers greater visibility into the impact of changing process conditions on asset integrity, before they lead to failure. We’ve got something special planned to showcase the solution. Register your interest to be among the first to see it: https://olitruecorr.com/

The model says supersaturated. The system has run clean for two years. Which one is wrong? Possibly neither. Kinetics may be slower than assumed, scale may be forming but not detected, inhibition may be performing better than credited, or the inputs may be less certain than they look. Injectivity trends, produced solids, pump performance and chemical dosing are what separate these cases. How field data corroborates or contradicts a prediction, and why both outcomes are useful.

Prevention, remediation and monitoring are all defensible positions. The prediction alone cannot tell you which one you are looking at. Prevention earns its cost where deposition is hard to reverse, the equipment is critical, or access is constrained. Remediation suits deposits that are accessible and tractable. Monitoring is right where the driving force is marginal and a wrong call is recoverable. The decision framework is set out in From Fluid Chemistry to Field Decisions.

A flowline can be pigged during a planned turnaround. A subsea completion cannot. Where access requires a dedicated vessel, barite removal may be effectively uneconomic and treating one well can mean shutting in adjacent producers on a shared manifold. Prevention stops being preferable and becomes the only economically rational strategy. How deposition location moves the threshold for action, well by well.