Drewl ads

Leads showing up as Direct in your CRM? Enter your domain and email and see what a free check of your public pages finds.

Two attribution tools, two different numbers for the same campaign. Which one do you trust? Run a free check and see what's actually tracking on your site.

Just your domain and an email. No account login, no call. See what we found on your site and what to check next.

HubSpot says 48 leads. GA4 says 31. Meta claims 22. LinkedIn claims 19. None of them agree. None of them are lying. Each tool is right about its own slice. GA4 knows how people moved through your site. HubSpot knows which named contacts became pipeline. The ad platforms know who they showed ads to. They disagree because you are asking four tools the same question and expecting one answer. So stop asking. Pick one system of record. For B2B that is almost always the CRM. Let the ad platforms do their own job and stop reconciling them to it. Then add the thing that beats all four: a "How did you hear about us?" field on your form. Self-reported answers catch what no pixel can see. Free, no rebuild, no new platform.

Your attribution report says LinkedIn drove 12 deals last quarter. It's guessing. It can't even see half the clicks it's taking credit for. We've scanned about 50 B2B stacks now. Almost every one splits credit between touches it never actually tracked. The model looks clever. The data going in is broken. So the answer comes out wrong. This is why people keep saying multi-touch attribution is dead. It's not. They've just been running it on a stack that can't feed it. Multi-touch works when three things are true. Your tracking fires on the pages where people actually buy, not just the home page. Something ties one person's visits together across their phone, laptop and email. And the model matches how people really buy from you, not a default built for online shops. Most B2B teams have none of the three. The numbers look off. So they blame the method and switch to something new. The method was never the problem. It matters more now. Teams are pointing AI at this same data to score leads and split budgets. Aim a smart tool at numbers it can't trust and it won't save you. It just gets you to the wrong call faster. So before you rip out the model, find out which of the three you're actually failing. That's the whole reason we built the scanner. Put your domain in, it checks those three things and tells you which ones are broken. Two minutes, no signup, no call. https://lnkd.in/dfZEu6WG Most people are surprised by which one it flags.

Most attribution reports are confident. That is not the same as correct. Run a free site check on your public pages. You get a plain report of what your tracking records, what fired, what did not, and where the source gets lost between the click and the lead. Two minutes. Just your domain and an email. No account login, no call. Every site comes back different. Find out what yours says.