51 Games ads

The 3 Things Killing Web3 Gaming (and How We’re Fixing Them) Web3 gaming isn’t broken — it’s just boring. Here’s why 👇 ❌ Problem 1: Tokenomics before gameplay Too many games launched with charts and roadmaps instead of fun. ✅ Our fix: Fun-first core loops. ❌ Problem 2: Ownership as a gimmick “Own this JPEG” isn’t compelling if the game sucks. ✅ Our fix: Assets that actually matter in-game. ❌ Problem 3: Grind walls Forcing players to burn hours isn’t retention — it’s punishment. ✅ Our fix: Progressive rewards that respect your time. We believe Web3 games can (and should) be fun, fair, and worth coming back to. 👉 Join us in building the future: https://51.games

Heheheeeey! I haven’t written anything funny (or at least entertaining) for quite a while, but I’ve decided it’s time to fix that. For the past year and a half, I’ve been working in the Web3 games space, while also having extensive experience in Web2 gamedev. Today I want to share a few thoughts about the differences (and similarities) between them. Everyone here is already familiar with classic Web2 gamedev, so let’s focus on Web3 for a bit. • 𝐊𝐞𝐲 𝐟𝐞𝐚𝐭𝐮𝐫𝐞 𝐨𝐟 𝐖𝐞𝐛𝟑: ownership. Players actually own their in-game assets — they can sell them, transfer them, or take them outside the game entirely. • The entire economy lives on the 𝐛𝐥𝐨𝐜𝐤𝐜𝐡𝐚𝐢𝐧 — currencies, tokens, NFTs. Players don’t just play; they can also trade. At this point, they aren't players and more like “respectable crypto investors”. • The primary monetization model is 𝐏𝐥𝐚𝐲-𝐭𝐨-𝐄𝐚𝐫𝐧: you play, earn tokens or NFTs, and later sell or exchange them. • 𝐓𝐫𝐚𝐧𝐬𝐩𝐚𝐫𝐞𝐧𝐜𝐲: Every transaction is recorded on the blockchain, making it publicly visible to anyone. • 𝐂𝐨𝐦𝐦𝐮𝐧𝐢𝐭𝐲: In Web3, the community has a much stronger impact on how the product develops compared to Web2. But here’s the most significant difference — 𝐩𝐥𝐚𝐲𝐞𝐫 𝐦𝐨𝐭𝐢𝐯𝐚𝐭𝐢𝐨𝐧. This was the hardest thing for me when I first entered Web3: completely rewire my mindset. The usual techniques from traditional gamedev in Web3, they work poorly… or don’t work at all. And then there’s A/B testing hell. Since everything is transparent and communities are hyper-connected, the moment you launch an A/B test (for example, on store pricing), all your variants are leaked into Discord or Telegram within seconds. Sometimes that ends in… let’s say, “less-than-ideal results.” But that’s a story for another post 😉 In summary: The primary driver for a Web3 player is converting their in-game effort into real-world value, typically in the form of financial gain. Classic gamedev sells chemical processes in the brain, Web3 also sells them, but adds valuable assets in the real world. And let’s be honest — you can’t put dopamine in your pocket or spread it on bread, khe-khe... I know many of you are from the classic gamedev side. So, what do you think about Web3? I'm curious to hear your thoughts. That’s all for now — see ya'll!

Gamescom 2025 – Day 1 The scale of this event is hard to put into words - so many incredible game developers, breakthrough technologies, and bold ideas under one roof. From early prototypes to industry-leading innovations, it’s proof that gaming continues to push boundaries every single year. And for us, it’s a clear sign: Web3 gaming must be part of that conversation.

The biggest Web3 gaming lesson from Gamescom 2025? Players don’t care about NFT/Blockchain buzzwords — they care about games that are genuinely worth playing. Here are our top takeaways from Cologne: 1️⃣ Cross-platform is the expectation, not the exception. 2️⃣ Retention comes from community, not just content drops. 3️⃣ Real ownership matters only if the game itself is worth owning. 4️⃣ Browser gaming is entering a rebirth. 👉 The key 2025 trend: Blending Web2 polish with Web3 freedom — delivering experiences that feel familiar, but unlock new possibilities for players and developers.