On air · 1 of 3 networks
Linkflow
- linkflow.ai
- Marketing & Advertising
- US
- 26 employees
Linkflow’s ads on LinkedIn, Meta and Google, recorded by adsrunning. Browse the latest here for free. Sign up free to see all 84. Watch Linkflow with Starter to get each new one in your feed.
Watchlist with Starter · $49/mo
| Network | Status | Live ads | Nov 2025LinkedIn activity · 52 weeksOct 2026 | Checked | Next step |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Running | 34 | Checked 30 Oct 2026 | See all 84 ads → | ||
| Meta | Not checked | — | |||
| None recorded | 0 | No ads found on the Google Ads Transparency Center | Checked 10 Oct 2026 | Collect them with the API → |
Linkflow has 34 live LinkedIn ads. We recorded no Google ads on 10 Oct 2026.
Latest ads
- LINKEDIN · IMAGESince 9 Feb 2026
Google Search Advocate John Mueller recently dropped a bomb on Reddit and most SaaS teams completely missed it. A founder complained their site didn't show up when they Googled their own company name. Mueller's response was along the lines of: If your site name looks like a generic phrase, Google doesn't assume people are looking for you. Most people treat that like basic SEO advice. But Mueller was describing something we all need to pay attention to: entity coherence. When your brand name isn’t uniquely identifiable (or your signals don’t consistently point to one entity), Google and AI have to guess. And when they have to guess, they hedge… or pick someone else with clearer signals. This is the default failure mode in AI search. It’s why B2B tools with real traction still don't appear when buyers ask an AI platform for recommendations. Because your entities don’t reliably resolve to one canonical thing. Example: - Legal/company name: Northstone Labs - Homepage hero: Meet Northstone (company-first) - App/store listing: FlowTable - Review sites: FlowTable (category: helpdesk) - Sales decks: Northstone Helpdesk - Founder LinkedIn: Building FlowTable at Northstone Result: three primary entities (company, product, feature) competing with one another. There's no corroborating signal. No clean thread for the AI to follow. So you never make the shortlist. Same thing happens when: - your product name is what buyers use, but your website uses the company name - your listings describe a “helpdesk,” your site says “customer ops,” and your founder says “sales support” - different surfaces describe you like different tools AI agents don't reconcile inconsistencies. They work off fast, repeated corroboration: one canonical entity + clearly-stated product relationship + consistent naming/URLs across surfaces. If your SaaS feels invisible in AI search, entity coherence could be the reason. Try this in ChatGPT: “[your company] vs [competitor]” Does it describe you cleanly… or does it hedge, confuse you with something else, or default to better-corroborated alternatives?
- LINKEDIN · IMAGESince 9 Feb 2026
Google recently sued SerpApi for its unlawful scraping of search results. The same API ChatGPT has been using. Mid-Dec 2025, Google filed a lawsuit against SerpApi for scraping and reselling search data. Prior to that, in August, it was also revealed that ChatGPT was using SerpApi to pull live Google results for questions about news, finance, sports, and real-time data. OpenAI claimed ChatGPT relied on its own crawler, Bing, and licensed data. That clearly wasn't enough. Even one of the most advanced AI models needs Google's index. Which means AI search didn't replace traditional SEO. It made it more important. If your site is crawlable and indexed in Google, you're feeding ChatGPT's answers. If you're not in Google's index, AI likely can't find you either. What HAS changed from traditional SEO: Being indexed isn't enough anymore. AI doesn't browse your site like a user. It extracts structured data. If your content requires interpretation (AI has to work to understand your page), it gets skipped. You need: - Clean HTML structure - Structured markup - Direct, extractable answers (Not better writing. Machine-readable formatting) And authority still matters. AI systems still default to: - Sites with trusted, relevant, and authoritative backlink profiles - Sites with clear entity definitions If you're not structurally clear and easy to parse by AI, you're outside the system. What part of SEO do you think most people are underestimating right now? Full article linked in comments for you.
- LINKEDIN · IMAGESince 9 Feb 2026
Your SaaS backlink profile looks great on Semrush… … but does absolutely nothing in AI search. A while ago, we audited what AI actually cites in SaaS per client category. It wasn’t the sites we were targeting. The sources showing up inside AI answers were completely different. Not always “authority sites” or DR-heavy guest posts. Instead, AI kept pulling from: → SaaS vendor blogs → Affiliate roundup/comparison sites → How-to/education hubs & big blogs → HR/People Ops media & professional resources → Market research/report vendors (“report mills”) → Job boards/marketplaces/misc. company blogs → Company/product marketing blogs → Review sites So we didn’t abandon link building, but built a second system alongside it. One specifically designed for LLM mentions. Below is how link building for SaaS actually differs in the AI search arena. We’ve used this new link approach to get our clients to #1 in LLM search. If you need help earning links and mentions that actually show up in AI search, DM me.
- LINKEDIN · IMAGESince 26 Jan 2026
"It's all just good SEO" ^ technically true, but…. …also why most SaaS teams are measuring the wrong outcomes. Traditional SEO optimizes for getting the click. GEO optimizes for being mentioned when the click never happens. Good SEO in 2019: Rank #1 for "best CRM for small business" Result: 8,000 clicks/month Good GEO in 2026: Be named in the AI answer for "what's the best CRM for a 10-person accountancy firm under $50/month" Result: 0 clicks. But the LLM already built the buyer’s shortlist, and you're on it. So yes, GEO is "just good SEO" in that bad content and weak authority signals lose in both systems. But no, it's not entirely the same game. I’ve broken it all down in this table. Share it with your team and hit repost to save another. Want help with good SEO and good GEO? Send me a DM.
- LINKEDIN · IMAGESince 26 Jan 2026
Most SaaS teams want better LLM visibility but don’t know where to start. Here are 10 actions you can take immediately to make AI models understand, trust, and surface your product. This checklist breaks down: • credibility & citations • entity mapping • UGC & third-party signals • AIO vs SEO diagnosis • multi-model measurement These are the same actions we use to get SaaS brands to #1 in LLM search. Save & repost for another team that needs it. Which one of these are you currently prioritizing?
- LINKEDIN · IMAGESince 19 Jan 2026
If you want LLMs to CONSISTENTLY recommend your SaaS brand, start with Linkflow’s 15 favorite GEO moves in this one-pager. Save it, share it, spread the love. P.S. These are pulled from the comprehensive +90-point GEO checklist we use to get clients to #1 in AI search. Want it? Comment ‘checklist’ and I’ll DM it over.
6 of 84 adsSign up to see every Linkflow ad, filter by format and date, and get alerts on new ones.
See all 84 adsWatch the companies you care about.
Filter every ad by industry, country, format and network, and get alerts when a company you watch starts running new ads.