Global Legal Group

How does Liechtenstein law approach fake consumer reviews and misleading recommendations on social media? This article highlights that certain practices are expressly prohibited under Liechtenstein's unfair competition framework. This includes: ❌ Submitting fake consumer reviews or endorsements ❌ Commissioning others to provide fake reviews ❌ Misrepresenting consumer reviews or recommendations for promotional purposes The chapter also explores wider rules around misleading and aggressive commercial practices. For businesses using reviews, influencers or social media as part of their marketing strategy, these rules are worth understanding.

This article provides a practical overview of the rules governing consumer protection, including: 🔹 The Consumer Protection Act (KSchG) 🔹 The Act against Unfair Competition (UWG) 🔹 Contractual and warranty rights under the ABGB 🔹 Online marketplaces and distance selling 🔹 Pricing practices and misleading conduct 🔹 Enforcement and available remedies 🔹 Current trends and anticipated reforms With consumer protection continuing to develop across Europe, understanding the local framework is increasingly important for businesses operating in the Liechtenstein market.

How must prices be presented to consumers in Liechtenstein? This article from the International Comparative Legal Guide - Consumer Protection 2026 examines the rules governing pricing practices, including requirements for the price actually payable to consumers to be disclosed. Liechtenstein's Price Disclosure Ordinance also aims to prevent misleading price information by requiring prices to be stated clearly and in a comparable manner. The chapter looks at the wider consumer protection framework, including enforcement and potential penalties for certain breaches.

From assessing liability and damages to testing counterfactual scenarios, economic analysis is playing an increasingly central role in UK competition disputes. This article examines what recent cases can teach us about presenting economic evidence that is robust, credible and genuinely useful to the courts.

Check out this article covering lessons from recent UK cases, exploring how economic experts can present analysis that is rigorous, credible and ultimately helpful to the courts. A useful read for anyone involved in competition litigation, class actions or economic expert evidence.

Recent UK cases highlight some clear principles: economic models must reflect the facts, experts must remain independent, and complex analysis needs to be presented clearly enough to assist the court. This article explores these lessons and the evolving role of economists in competition disputes.