Eurostep

We’re looking forward to today’s webinar together with Peter Lydh from SystemWeaver and our own Simon Pettersson! If you need to keep requirements structured, traceable, and visible across suppliers, get a first-hand look at how this works in practice, from structuring them in SystemWeaver to sharing and tracking them with suppliers in ShareAspace, with full visibility of progress and compliance. Join us live at 15:00 CEST, or register to watch on demand: https://lnkd.in/eNMG_d7m

Are your requirements still fully traceable once they reach suppliers? Once context is lost, progress becomes harder to see and changes harder to control! Join our webinar at 15:00 CEST tomorrow to see how you can structure your requirements in SystemWeaver and share and track them with suppliers, with full visibility of progress and compliance in #ShareAspace. Can’t join live? Register now and watch it on demand: https://lnkd.in/eNMG_d7m

What happens when RFQs, specifications and supplier responses are managed across different teams, systems and communication channels? Information is hard to trust. Supplier input is hard to compare. Changes are hard to track. Compliance coverage takes time to prove. And decisions are slower, less precise and more dependent on manual coordination. Join Simon Pettersson and Peter Lydh for a live webinar on how organisations can improve supplier collaboration speed and control by replacing document-heavy RFQ processes with a more structured, data-driven approach. The session includes a practical multi-supplier scenario showing how ShareAspace by Eurostep and SystemWeaver by Systemite can help teams connect requirements, design information, supplier responses and compliance feedback within a controlled RFQ workflow. 📅 17 June 2026 🕑 15:00 CEST ⏱ 45 minutes Register now: https://lnkd.in/eNMG_d7m

Still stitching together multiple supplier responses manually? That’s where most RFQ processes stall. Not because teams lack input… but because the input isn’t structured to compare, track or trust! So, decisions get delayed while teams spend countless hours reformating supplier data, clarifying inconsistencies, or chasing updates across emails and multiple files. Surely, there’s a better way to work? Join us for a live session where Simon Pettersson and Peter Lydh will showcase how structured RFQ collaboration using ShareAspace and SystemWeaver helps you move from fragmented documents to connected, decision-ready data. You’ll see a practical multi-supplier scenario demonstrating how to: ✔ Compare suppliers without manual rework ✔ Keep requirements and responses aligned ✔ Track changes with full visibility ✔ Strengthen compliance with traceable data ✔ Make faster, more confident decisions Join us on June 17 at 15:00 CEST to see it live! 👉 Register now: https://lnkd.in/eNMG_d7m

When requirements and supplier collaboration are disconnected, teams spend more time translating than deciding. What happens when the flow is finally connected? Most RFQ challenges start before suppliers are even involved: - Requirements live in one system. - Collaboration happens in another. - And teams spend the rest of the process trying to reconnect them. On June 17, we’re hosting a joint webinar with SystemWeaver to show what changes when that connection is built in. In a live scenario, you’ll see how #SystemWeaver and #ShareAspace work together to: ✅ Keep requirements structured and traceable 🔗 Connect them directly to RFQs and supplier input 👁️ Maintain a shared, controlled view across teams 📊 Evaluate responses in full context No rework. Just clearer decisions, faster. 📅 June 17 🕒 15:00-15:45 CEST Register now: https://lnkd.in/eNMG_d7m #SupplierCollaboration #SystemsEngineering #PLM #DigitalEngineering

Most sourcing issues don’t start in sourcing. They start much earlier. When requirements move between teams and suppliers, three things tend to break: 🔎 Context gets lost Requirements are shared, but not their dependencies or intent 👀 Changes are hard to track Teams don’t know what’s current, approved, or already delivered 😶🌫️ Progress becomes opaque There’s no clear view of supplier status across multiple work packages That’s when delays, rework, and late surprises begin. We’re showing how teams are addressing this by integrating requirements, sourcing, and supplier collaboration into a single structured flow. If this is something you’re dealing with, see how it works: https://lnkd.in/eFcnZq9J