BlinkOps

There's been a flood of PHP2Shell guidance this week. Every vendor has published something, and it's spread across dozens of blogs, advisories, and KB articles. → So we pulled it all into one place: https://lnkd.in/e2KRUJFZ The PHP2Shell Community Hub has 100+ articles from across the industry. You can filter by what you need to do (am I affected, patch, block, detect) and by the tools you already run, so your vendors' guidance shows up first. It includes work from CrowdStrike, Wiz, Palo Alto Networks Unit 42, Tenable, Google Cloud Security, Amazon Web Services (AWS), Elastic, Rapid7, Akamai Technologies, and plenty more. → If you're still working through your exposure, take a look this weekend: https://lnkd.in/e2KRUJFZ Published guidance we missed? Email [email protected] and we'll add it.

Most security programs reach Tier 2 or 3 on NIST CSF 2.0 and stop there. The problem usually isn't the policy. It's that Tier 4 asks for execution that adjusts in near real time, and a runbook worked by hand can't keep up. On September 29, Filip Stojkovski and Adam Evans are joining ISC2 to walk through what changes when an Agentic Security Operations Platform takes on the repeatable work. We'll cover: 🔹 What each CSF tier looks like operationally 🔹 Where automation should simply run and where an agent needs to reason over context 🔹 Which decisions still belong to a human, in or on the loop, based on risk 🔹 How Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover each change at Tier 4 🔹 How to talk about CSF maturity with the executive board Register now 👉 https://lnkd.in/eq_-6mZc

Most AI SOCs run as a black box. You see the verdict, but not how the AI got there. That's fine until an auditor, your board, or an incident review asks you to explain a decision your SOC made autonomously. "The AI flagged it" is not an answer. This guide covers what to demand before you sign: visibility into what the model ingests, control over the context it reasons on, and an audit trail for every output. No black boxes. Get instant access →

AI SOC doesn't hallucinate because the model is bad. It hallucinates because it's reasoning on the wrong context. Garbage in, hallucinations out. The vendors worth your budget let you control what goes in - the inputs, the context, the guardrails - so the outputs and decisions are something you can actually stand behind. This guide shows you how to evaluate input control and context governance before you commit. Get instant access →

Security leaders are making AI SOC decisions without the right framework. This guide gives you one, built around a single reframe: AI SOC isn't a tooling decision. It's a risk decision. Learn what it reduces, introduces, and the 3 questions to ask before you sign. Get instant access

Most AI SOC conversations get framed as a tooling decision. That's the wrong conversation. In this guide you'll learn: 1. What risks AI SOC reduces, and what it introduces 2. How to use it to retire tools instead of adding one more 3. The 3 questions to ask every vendor before you sign Download free →