Whatagraph

At most agencies, AI lives with one person. They’ve wired up the ad accounts and built the prompts, while the rest of the team still works the old way. Every time a model updates or a connection breaks, it’s back on that one person to fix. At some point you have to decide whether to keep investing in that setup, switch to a tool the whole team can use, or run both. We’re digging into that live on November 5 with two agencies already running agents on client work. Sjoerd van Harmelen built one of the most advanced in-house AI setups we’ve seen at Sababa team - Digital Growth Marketing. He’ll share what he’d build again and what he’d rather not maintain. Anna A.’s team at GKV cut monthly reporting time by 75% with agents and now clears backlog tasks in minutes. She’ll show how. Justas Malinauskas, co-founder and CEO at Whatagraph, will cover where agents are paying off for the agencies he talks to. Sjoerd and Anna will also each run one of their agents live, so you’ll leave with workflows you can adapt for your own team. Register below, we’d love to see you there!

Some AI work is worth building in-house, and some costs more to maintain than it saves. Learn how two agencies decide which is which.

GKV agency put agents on the routine work and reinvested the time where it counts: faster, stronger client service and more strategic thinking.

Most agency AI setups work for the person who built them. See how two agencies made theirs work for everyone, and leave with two workflows to adapt.

When leadership asks which locations are worth the ad spend, CTR and CPC can’t answer it. Here’s what experienced PPC practitioners put in their reports instead.

You’ve already got clean, connected data in Whatagraph. Agents take the repetitive work off the team and save the hours. You sign off before it ships.