Hoover Institution, Stanford University

Universities cannot fulfill their educational mission without protecting the freedom to speak, question, and challenge ideas. Student expression is a cornerstone of learning, and both public and many private universities recognize that safeguarding speech is essential to rigorous academic development. Find out what's true and what's not about Free Speech in the United States—read our fact-based primer: https://lnkd.in/g3H3Jx9e

A platform operating under the laws of an authoritarian state gains the ability to influence how Americans think, access personal data, and advance another government's strategic aims. Such leverage creates vulnerabilities that require a strong and deliberate U.S. response to protect national security, personal privacy, and the integrity of the information space. Get the facts on Free Speech in the United States—read our nonpartisan primer: https://lnkd.in/gcyzqrAw

On the sidelines of the Jackson Hole Economic Symposium, Federal Reserve Governors Mary C. Daly, Tom Barkin, and Austan Goolsbee discussed key themes in today's economy with Hoover Senior Fellow Steven J. Davis. Watch their conversations on Economics, Applied: https://lnkd.in/eYACK2hv

Censorship, even when driven by good intentions, undermines the foundation of a free society. Suppressing offensive speech creates a cycle in which every group seeks to silence others, eroding the principle of equal freedom. The preservation of liberty depends not on restricting ideas, but on confronting them through open argument and reasoned debate. Want to learn more about Free Speech? Read our fact-based, nonpartisan primer here: https://lnkd.in/gH6gDehd

One of the biggest misconceptions about Social Security is that today's payments secure your tomorrow's benefits. In this clip, Hoover Senior Research Fellow Milton Friedman reveals that Social Security is not a savings plan but a pay-as-you-go system in which the taxes workers pay today fund current retirees. Get the facts—read our Social Security primer here: https://lnkd.in/gRFmRuct

Can governments legally restrict freedom of speech without violating individual rights? Restrictions on time, place, and manner are permissible if they remain content-neutral and narrowly tailored to serve public interests. These measures aim to balance individual right to free speech with societal needs, ensuring fairness without favoring any single viewpoint. Understand your rights with our fact-based Free Speech primer: https://lnkd.in/dEz9a9By